U.S. Supreme Court Justice Discussion

U.S. Supreme Court Justice

WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project

Total Points: 25

Read pp. 71 (Decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court) through p. 80 (U.S. Supreme Court Justices) and excluding case 3.1 in our text. Note: Justice Amy Coney Barrett does not appear on p. 78 but is the newest Justice of the Supreme Court who joined in Fall 2020.
Research and prepare a summary of a current Supreme Court Justice of your choice. Who are they? Where are they from? What appeals court were they appointed from and by whom? Cite sources (Chicago, MLA, or Bluebook). 10 points
Answer the following questions in a series of paragraphs – each with an appropriate header title (minimum 4 sentences each):

1) How do politics influence the Supreme Court? 5 points

2) How do the Justices exemplify (or not) this influence? For example, do they exhibit a philosophy of strict construction or judicial activism. 5 points

3) Who is an example of a Justice who is considered to be conservative? Liberal? In between? Who is the current “Swing” vote on the Supreme Court? 5 points

4) Is the Justice you selected to summarize considered to be “pro-business”? 5 points

5) What do you think of the influence of politics on the Supreme Court? Can it be avoided? Should it be avoided or embraced? 3 points

Proofread your paper very carefully. If there are more than 3 typos or grammatical errors, your grade will be lowered by 2 points.

Note: I will provide the tutor that works with me on this question the access to the book in which you will need to read pages 71-80 in order to complete this assignment.

Requirements: No words requirement but please make sure to provide me with a very good and complete work please.

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.