Biotas Chi Square Discussion Assignment
WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project
Write My Essay For MeDiscussion: Chi Square
Please write the initial post and follow the instructions and the grading rubric. After writing the initial discussion I can send you 2 discussions of my colleagues to write responses too. Thanks
Initial Post:
Design your own study where the Chi Square test would be the appropriate test statistic. Give (1) your sample, (2) research question, (3) the appropriate test with the null and research hypotheses, and (4) the two variables, including (a) how you would measure both variables and (b) each variable’s level of measurement. Be creative. Do not include data in your response.
Response Posts:
Read the posts of other learners and respond to at least 2 other learners. Your responses are expected to be substantive in nature and reference the assigned readings, as well as other theoretical, empirical, or professional literature to support your views and writings.
In your response, make modifications to their study. For example, could the outcome variable have been measured in another way? Could a different test or sample have been used?
M3-M5 Discussion Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample |
| 5 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 3 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 1 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | 5 pts | |||
| 5 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 3 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 1 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | ||||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Question |
| 10 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 8 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 3 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | 10 pts | |||
| 10 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 8 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 3 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | ||||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTest and Hypotheses |
| 10 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 8 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 3 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | 10 pts | |||
| 10 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 8 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 3 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | ||||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVariables |
| 5 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 3 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 1 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | 5 pts | |||
| 5 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 3 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 1 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | ||||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response |
| 10 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 8 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 3 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | 10 pts | |||
| 10 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 8 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 3 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | ||||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response |
| 10 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 8 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 3 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | 10 pts | |||
| 10 ptsMeets Standard
Thoroughly responds to all components of the question; critical thinking apparent; course content applied; provides evidence/support. | 8 ptsApproaching Standard
Partially responds to question in a meaningful way; response may lack completeness or evidence of critical thinking; does not provide enough evidence/support. | 3 ptsNot Meeting Standard
Lacking entirely, or severely limited in content/quality. | ||||||
| Total Points: 50 |
Biotas Chi Square Discussion Assignment ESSAY
DO MY HOMEWORK NOW!Write my Essay. Premium essay writing services is the ideal place for homework help or essay writing service. if you are looking for affordable, high quality & non-plagiarized papers, click on the button below to place your order. Provide us with the instructions and one of our writers will deliver a unique, no plagiarism, and professional paper.
Get help with your toughest assignments and get them solved by a Reliable Custom Papers Writing Company. Save time, money and get quality papers. Buying an excellent plagiarism-free paper is a piece of cake!
All our papers are written from scratch. We can cover any assignment/essay in your field of study.
