NURS 8114 Discussion Exploring Middle Range Theories and Framing Practice Issues
NURS 8114 Discussion Exploring Middle Range Theories and Framing Practice Issues
WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project
Write My Essay For MeNursing Practice Issue
There has been an increase in compassion fatigue (CF) in our organization in the past year, leading to burnout (BO) and patient dissatisfaction. In a high demanding, complex environment, nurses are a group of healthcare professionals seeking to care for others while lacking self-care. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought several variables leading to this issue with the healthcare professionals. As the healthcare professionals on the frontline caring and communicating with patients, their families, and friends, they are dealing with situations that make it challenging to maintain personal compassion and self-care. There has been a surge in emergency room patients and inpatients. Unfortunately, there has been a shortage of personal resources, supplies, and bed availability in the hospitals. Healthcare workers with CF and BO are overwhelmed, emotionally exhausted, fearful of lack of supplies, staff, and making loved ones sick, self-care, and enjoyment of their purpose (Watts & Thorne-Odem, 2020). The effects of CF and BO amongst nurses before the COVID-19 pandemic were 22% to 60%. During the pandemic, the impact of CF and BO reached 70%, 38.6% of the frontline workers experienced medium to high CF (Labrague & de los Santos, 2021).
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS ON NURS 8114 Discussion Exploring Middle Range Theories and Framing Practice Issues
Middle Range Nursing Theories
Middle-range theories are a combination of nursing practice with nursing research. More nurses use this theory in research, they are abstract, cover a broad spectrum of nursing, and specify relations between two or more concepts (McEwen & Willis, 2019).
NURS 8114 Discussion Exploring Middle Range Theories and Framing Practice Issues Slayers
The theory of human caring by Jean Watson, the theory of holistic comfort by Kolcaba, and the Roy adaptation model are theories and models that will help address the issue for CF and BO.
The theory of human caring by Jean Watson focuses on the care of both the patient and the healthcare provider; Watson believes that self-care, self-compassion, and respect are variables to be addressed within oneself and others. This theory evaluates the healthcare provider personally and professionally (Durgun Ozan et al., 2020). Many hospitals are using her theory as a guide to establishing professional nursing practice change, promoting quality of care as in the magnet hospital program (Watson, 2009). In the article by Durgun Ozan et al. (2020), they performed a study using the theory of human caring to study the effect of clinical education on students’ coping and anxiety levels. The variables, such as stress amongst the nursing students, were addressed by improving coping mechanisms, preparing the student for new environments, consequently reducing stress and anxiety.
Katherine Kolcabas’ theory on holistic comfort improves nursing practice and establishes best practices; for nursing guides in nursing practices. Kolcaba (1994) defines comfort as “the satisfaction (actively, passively or co-operatively) of the basic human needs for relief, ease or transcendence arising from health care situations that are stressful.” She developed a taxonomic structure of comfort (comfort grid) that identifies the patient’s needs. The needs discussed are the physical, psychospiritual, sociocultural, and environmental aspects (1994). In the study, “Application of Kolcaba’s comfort theory to the management of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma” (Shu Hua, 20170), they discussed the comfort grid and their findings to establish the needs of the patient in pain under palliative care, improving patient outcomes. Caring for someone in need during a stressful event, responding to their needs enhances the patient’s outcomes and how they feel cared for by the healthcare professionals (McEwen & Willis, 2019; Kolcaba, 1994).
The Roy adaption model(RAM) promotes patient adaptation, a goal of nursing care; this theory reflects how individuals or groups react to events in their environment. Callis (2020) discussed different nursing variables, such as CF and BO, their effects on patients, and poor outcomes. Roy’s theory defines nursing as a scientific and humanistic profession and believes that specialized knowledge is essential in the health needs and well-being of the community (Hamzehpour et al., 2018). Callis (2020) discussed using Roy’s theory and the development of and evaluation of hospital-based programs. Tea for the soul (TFS) is a theoretical framework developed by the clergyman and social workers at a hospital to address the needs of nurses under challenging situations, such as bereavement. Emphasizing the need for self-care, the patient’s and staff’s well-being, compassion, and understanding others and their needs will reduce CF and BO.
Using nursing theories with nursing practice complement each other. The utilization of nursing theories gives guidance in developing, understanding, and implementing processes and procedures to benefit nursing practice. The use of theoretical frameworks provides tools to address the needs of healthcare professionals and others, improving outcomes and patient and healthcare profession’s satisfaction.
References
Callis, A. M. (2020). Application of the Roy Adaptation Theory to a care program for nurses. Applied Nursing Research, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151340
Durgun Ozan, Y., Duman, M., Çiçek, Ö., & Baksi, A. (2020). The effects of clinical education program based on Watson’s theory of human caring on coping and anxiety levels of nursing students: A randomized control trial. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 56(3), 621-628. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12477
Hamzehpour, H., Valiee, S., Majedi, M. A., Roshani, D., & Seidi, J. (2018). The Effect of Care Plan Based on Roy Adaptation Model on the Incidence and Severity of Delirium in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 12(11), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/36366.12256
Labrague, L. J., & de los Santos, J. A. A. (2021). Resilience as a mediator between compassion fatigue, nurses’ work outcomes, and quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Nursing Research, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151476
McEwen, M., & Willis, E.M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer
Shu Hua, N. G. (2017). Application of Kolcaba’s Comfort Theory to the Management of a Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Singapore Nursing Journal, 44(1), 16-23.
Watson, J. (2009). Caring science and human caring theory: Transforming personal and professional practices of nursing and health care. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration, 31(4), 466-482.
Watts, S. A., & Thorne-Odem, S. (2020). Nursing yourself away from burnout and compassion fatigue to resilience and joy at work. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy!, 18(6), 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NME.0000717684.70292.43
Discussion: Exploring Middle Range Theories and Framing Practice Issues
You will begin this Discussion by identifying a practice issue that will be your frame of reference as you analyze the theoretical basis of nursing practice. Be aware that your choice can potentially carry through the course, as you will continue to address this issue in the context of other types of theories in Week 3. This practice issue can also be one focus of your Module 3 exploration of evidence-based practice and quality improvement, and your Module 4 investigation of a critical practice question. Consequently, as you prepare for this Discussion, think carefully about your example for connecting middle range nursing theories to patient care.
Photo Credit: steheap / Adobe Stock
To prepare:
- Analyze your nursing practice for issues of particular interest or concern to you. Identify one issue as the focus of your application of theory to practice. NURS 8114 Discussion Exploring Middle Range Theories and Framing Practice Issues
- Review the Week 2 Learning Resources to identify specific middle range theories that may apply to your practice issue.
- Choose at least two middle range theories that might be most relevant and valuable in addressing your practice issue.
- Search the Walden Library for scholarly articles that address application of middle range theories to practice issues.
- Consider how to frame your focus practice issue in terms of the middle range theories that you have selected.
With these thoughts in mind …
By Day 3 of Week 2
Post an explanation of your practice issue. Then, describe two middle range theories that are most valuable in addressing this issue and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.
By Day 6 of Week 2
Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days by suggesting other middle-range theories for them to consider. Support your recommendations with at least one scholarly article to share with each colleague.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 2 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 of Week 2 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 2
To Participate in this Discussion:
Week 2 Discussion
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
- Grid View
- List View
| Excellent
90%–100% |
Good
80%–89% |
Fair
70%–79% |
Poor
0%–69% |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).
Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three current credible sources. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).
Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible references. |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).
One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Cited with fewer than two credible references. |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible references. |
| Main Posting:
Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely.
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely.
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely.
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
| Main Posting:
Timely and full participation |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts main Discussion by due date. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts main Discussion by due date. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date.
|
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post main Discussion by due date. |
| First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
|
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
|
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
|
| First Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| First Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
|
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date. |
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
|
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
|
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
|
| Second Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| Second Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
|
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date. |
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Use the following coupon code :
SAVE15
NURS 8114 Discussion Exploring Middle Range Theories and Framing Practice Issues ESSAY
DO MY HOMEWORK NOW!Write my Essay. Premium essay writing services is the ideal place for homework help or essay writing service. if you are looking for affordable, high quality & non-plagiarized papers, click on the button below to place your order. Provide us with the instructions and one of our writers will deliver a unique, no plagiarism, and professional paper.
Get help with your toughest assignments and get them solved by a Reliable Custom Papers Writing Company. Save time, money and get quality papers. Buying an excellent plagiarism-free paper is a piece of cake!
All our papers are written from scratch. We can cover any assignment/essay in your field of study.
