POS500 School board meeting Assignment

POS500 School board meeting Assignment

Attend a school board meeting for a local school district. If you are unable to attend in person, you may watch a live stream or an official recorded video of a recent school board meeting.

In a 500-750-word reflection about your experience, address the following:

1. Describe each item addressed at the board meeting. What was being discussed and why?

2. Explain who was in attendance at the meeting. What kinds of people were there? Why were they there? Were you surprised by who attended?

3. Describe who presented at the meeting. Were the presentations civil? Did you agree with one side or another of the arguments?

4. What you learned at this board meeting.

5. How you will use what you learned as a teacher.

Submit a copy of the meeting agenda to LoudCloud with your reflection.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
POS-500	POS-500-O504	Field Experience	200.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Category	90.0%
Describe each item addressed at the board meeting. What was being discussed and why?	20.0%	Reflection is missing or does not mention any items addressed at the meeting or why it was being discussed.	Reflection mentions items that were addressed at the board meeting but offers no elaboration as to why.	Reflection mentions items that were addressed at the board meeting with a basic explanation of why they were presented.	Reflection mentions items that were addressed at the board meeting with a detailed explanation of why they were presented.	Reflection discusses items that were addressed at the board meeting with a detailed and relevant explanation of why they were presented.
Explain who was in attendance at the meeting. What kinds of people were there? Why were they there? Were you surprised by who attended?	15.0%	Reflection does not mention who was in attendance, what kinds of people were there, why they were there, or offer any personal opinions about attendees.	Reflection mentions who was in attendance but offers no further elaboration on what types of people were present or why they were there. No personal opinion on attendees was provided.	Reflection explains who was in attendance, along with a basic explanation of what types of people were present and why they were there. Brief personal opinion about attendees is shared.	Reflection explains who was in attendance with a detailed description of different types of people present, and why they were present. A thoughtful opinion is expressed about attendees.	Reflection explains who was in attendance with a detailed description of different types of people present, and why they were present. An insightful and professionally relevant opinion is expressed about attendees.
Describe who presented at the meeting. Were the presentations civil? Did you agree with one side or another of the arguments?	15.0%	Reflection does not state who presented at the board meeting, elaborate on the civility of the presentations, or offer any personal opinions about the arguments.	Reflection mentions who presented but offers no description of the civility of the presentations. No personal opinion about the arguments is presented.	Reflection describes who presented at the meeting and elaborates on the civility of the presentations. A basic personal opinion statement is provided in regard to the arguments.	Reflection describes who presented at the meeting and offers a detailed account of the civility of the presentations. A thoughtful personal opinion is provided in regard to the arguments.	Reflection describes who presented at the meeting and offers a detailed account of the civility of the presentations. A thoughtful personal opinion is provided in regard to the arguments with an explanation as to why they feel this way.
What you learned at this board meeting	20.0%	Reflection does not address what was learned from this board meeting.	Reflection mentions only one item that was learned from this board meeting, explanation is vague or unclear.	Reflection adequately addresses what was learned from this board meeting.	Reflection clearly describes what was learned from this board meeting. Reflection is detailed.	Reflection describes in detail what was learned from this board meeting. Reflection is thoughtful and comprehensive.
How you will use what you learned as a teacher	20.0%	Reflection does not discuss how they will use what they have learned as a teacher.	Reflection mentions suggestions as to what they learned that they will use as a teacher, but makes no mention of how.	Reflection adequately discusses how they will use what they have learned as a teacher.	Reflection clearly discusses how they will use what they have learned as a teacher. Reflection is detailed.	Reflection describes in detail how they will use what they have learned as a teacher. Reflection is thoughtful and comprehensive.
Organization and Effectiveness	10.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Purpose Development and 500-750-word count	5.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Reflection does not meet the minimum word count.	Reflection purpose is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Reflection does not meet the minimum word count.	Reflection purpose is apparent and appropriate. Reflection meets the minimum word count.	Reflection purpose is clear and descriptive. Reflection meets the minimum word count.	Reflection is comprehensive and the purpose of the paper clear. Reflection meets the minimum word count and does not exceed maximum word count.
Total Weightage	100%

The post POS500 School board meeting Assignment appeared first on Essay Shredder.

Write my Essay. Premium essay writing services is the ideal place for homework help or essay writing service. if you are looking for affordable, high quality & non-plagiarized papers, click on the button below to place your order. Provide us with the instructions and one of our writers will deliver a unique, no plagiarism, and professional paper.

Get help with your toughest assignments and get them solved by a Reliable Custom Papers Writing Company. Save time, money and get quality papers. Buying an excellent plagiarism-free paper is a piece of cake!

All our papers are written from scratch. We can cover any assignment/essay in your field of study.